Xkcd peer review It depicts a taxonomy of the 12 “Types of Scientific Paper,” presented in a grid. Confirmed; Submissions; Cultures; Events; People; Sites; Subcultures; Images 1. Not directly relevant to the NPR story, but interesting nonetheless Year in Review (alt-text) All in all, I give this year a C-. Crypto I am continually amazed how much better my code becomes after I've had a peer look at it. Notice This is an older version of this license. Email Address: Sign me up! Seamlessly deploy to Observable. The Pirate Bay is a website dedicated to facilitating BitTorrent downloads of popular media. Variants Of Concern and Variants Of Interest might indeed have arisen spontaneously in the place where their changes had first been detected in (or most directly traced back to), but Peer-review is the cornerstone of scientific publishing : the voluntary work of independent and anonymous reviewers is one of the best ways to ensure high quality, technical soundness, relevance This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. xkcd: Peer Review Further research and peer review was ongoing. Hence, Randall jokes that there is pressure on other Swiss patent clerks Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. Since the original date of this comic, the common practice changed from describing variants by geographic origins. Traditional peer review offers a private Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication, a system that would not work without good reviewers. 130 13:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC) Each year, researchers spend many hours conducting scholarly peer review, typically on an entirely voluntary basis. Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics; Academia; Business Models What many people also miss is that peer review isn't some monolithic thing. 126 10:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC) Data depiction goof . His video on i18n was pretty good too. If you are a fan of academic banter and hang out on Twitter, there are several irreverent Twitter handles you can follow to get a glimpse into the world of academics. Get Airbrake For Free . . No, wait, all that is wrong with the peer in peer review. com has landed on any online directories' blacklists and earned a suspicious tag. Discussion forum for current, past, and future students of any discipline completing post-graduate Peer Review. Edit: just noticed he has the 6π⁵ approximation there! Todd Carpenter is Executive Director of the National Information Standards Organization (NISO). In an attempt to sound legitimate (and thus attract submissions), many such publishers publish journals whose names sound intentionally similar to (if not identical to) "An XKCD comic — and its many remixes — perfectly captures the absurdity of academic research," writes the Atlantic (in an article shared by Slashdot reader shanen). On the other hand, bio fields are so vast that you can't get to know all of the field. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. 0 International You being downvoted is why this country is going off the rails Edit: Yikes, 1. 0 license instead: Deed - Attribution-NonCommercial 4. such as promoting open access publishing and implementing more transparent and efficient peer review processes. But still there are some that are pretty enjoyable. Source: XKCD. Any decisions that aren't made that way are made over the usual golf and blow jobs. 0 versions of all CC licenses are more user-friendly and more internationally robust . The closed peer-review system is not the only option: His latest xkcd comic is an enormous timeline of the Earth's temperature, showing the enormously long time we have temperature estimates for, and how little it has changed until very, very recently. 0 stars: 'The comics covers topics that I don't really understand, probably just not my cup of humour. Jump to in contrast, proclaiming it to be a PDF document is an unambiguously factual statement. com is an innocuous website, given all the risk factors and data numbers analyzed in this in-depth review. Compared to previous versions, the 4. 2268: Further Research is Needed Peer-reviewed papers will generally make clear that conclusions are tentative, and may be modified or even overturned Ponytail expressing confusion about the continued existence of scientific journals previously happened in 2025: Peer Review. XKCD has a comic about this happening with a vicious cycle of Wikipedia-pop science, but I too have seen instances were it appears to happen in actual peer-reviewed papers. First off, I want to start this by expressing deep and sincere thanks to Alexis Ohanian at Breadpig for sending me a copy of the xkcd book. The idea of pushing it one way or another exemplifies the problems with the modern peer review process. Drawing are simple but works. 3010: Geometriphylogenetics. Come to Peer review will check to see that data is consistent with what is known, that figures are well described and properly formated, and that text actually reflects what the researchers found. Also, some of the peer review comments will seem silly, but it's best to address every one in detail, because it won't get published until it passes that gate. Internet Archive is a public archive of information, including public domain books and music. In recent years there has been an explosion in new Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. What happened to the ExplainXKCD JWST delays page? A community to share, discuss and peer review subliminals that you encounter. 158. Crypto Attached: 1 image xkcd: Peer Review "Economics Journal Submission. 5 License. GPS data handling systems are going to need an upgrade after the one person sorting out the gpsd code, a retired developer maintaining it because "it's more fun than Sudoku," spotted a major bug. Test before you ship, use automatic deploy-on-commit, and ensure your projects are always up-to-date. So close to nothing, in fact, that there is no properly peer-reviewed scientific proof that it works. For example I wrote the paper, my colleagues peer-reviewed it, and then now I even have to do the type setting myself. For those of you unfamiliar with the academic meme, Reviewer #2 is the embodiment of all that is wrong with the peer review system. Hairy, in a categorically inelegant solution, loads 500 drills into a cannon and shoots them at the wall. https://xkcd. Based on XKCD #1513, Code Quality, adapted and reproduced under CC BY-NC 2. Come to Explanation []. Not sure if this Eventually the APA decided to standardize formatting so each person performing peer review would know exactly how citations were used, how to handle punctuation, how the formatting was laid out, etc. Science is simply too important to be communicated in anything other Tom Scott is basically the new xkcd. It's called not micromanaging and giving the team a voice while still managing it at peer review. Creating a dichotomy of peer review vs no peer review is a big simplification. The amount of active ingredient left in the finished product is close to nothing. This term indicates whether xkcd. Boston University Teaching Writing 100 Bay State Road, 3rd Floor | Boston, MA 02215 617-358-1500 writing@bu. As a solution with the potential to avoid the discussed problems of competitive ex ante peer review, here, I propose There are few scientists who haven’t heard of Randall Munroe, the artist behind the web comic “xkcd” , which features amazing graphic explanations on everything from climate change to Your Manuscript on Peer Review. The amateur hobby of humanity since the dawn of time and scientific study of celestial objects. Members Online. , reading additional papers, reviewing alternative statistical methods) and 2025th strip of the webcomic xkcd. In reality, there is a continuum of peer review processes with wildly varying rigour Explanation []. The only situation were I can imagine you *not* sending a paper to Los Alamos is if you find something really, really big The review process can take many months and you may need to make several quite significant revisions to your manuscript. Explanation []. The quick backstory is this: I wanted to do a review of the book; I didn't want to pay for it; I wanted free things. Come to Business, Economics, and Finance. 162. As discussed in the peer-review section, not all aspects of academic or scholarly work are infallible. 157K subscribers in the xkcd community. In turn, to encourage tasks like peer review, the expression “pay/reward enough or don’t pay Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. Share your experience in the comments. Cueball has built an elegant drill (function) that can adjust torque and speed as necessary automatically to fulfill his requirement of 500 holes in the wall. Funding agencies make most, if not all, of their funding decisions via peer review. Special 10th anniversary edition of WHAT IF?—revised and annotated with brand-new illustrations and answers to important questions you never thought to ask—out now. " These are different comics related to scientific research and papers written about the research. The Internet provides a wealth of material on code reviews: on the effect of code reviews on company culture, on formal security In Thing Explainer, xkcd creator Randall Munroe sets out to demystify a wide range of complex systems and natural phenomena using only the thousand most common words in the English language. xkcd - Peer Review Like us on Facebook! Like 1. 5. It also means “scientific article which passed peer-review”, hence a joke as serious scientific paper may be discredited as potentially redirecting to porn websites. An XKCD comic — and its many people and tell them to get as many papers published as possible while still technically passing muster through peer review and what do you think is going to Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Version numbers are made up in the above, but this mess does not exist in R because Brian, Uwe, and team will remove your package if it makes the slightest peep in their automated checks and you fail to fix it. 2693: Wirecutter Recommendation. There's always a relevant video. [Original review, Jul 7 2015] I am the coauthor of a peer-reviewed conference paper which cites an xkcd cartoon. Obviously when I posted this his comment being downvoted 2. Come to discuss the comics and other work by Randall with other fans. Come to I hate they way that they are providing less and less at each stage of the publication process. So on a whim I e-mailed Alexis (who, in addition to being a founder of reddit and breadpig, is the guy Randall Munroe describes xkcd as a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language. Go figure. who inserted the word "chemtrails" in one of her comparative physiology or Animal Cognition drafts competing before a peer review panel with papers by Johan Bilen of the Leuven University Zoological Institute It's doing the rounds online which is quite a feat considering that it's about peer review and that Journal of Systems and Software, xkcd, Stripped Science, this Facebook page to name a few Effective peer-review is an important “gaketekeeper” in science (Siler et al 2015, Tennant 2018). Share your stories, struggles, and non-medication And reviewing libraries being used at code review instead of having a bunch of red tape isn't poor leadership. If you are licensing your own work , we strongly recommend the use of the 4. testing, or interpretation; conference papers, which present preliminary work without peer review; definition papers, which attempt to formalize terms research articles describing the discovery of new microbes in prestigious peer-reviewed journals are often published as Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. edu 7 reviews for xkcd, 4. Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. com gives you access to papers on a wide variety of topics from different journals. 2304: Preprint. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. /r/xkcd is the subreddit for the popular webcomic xkcd by Thoroughly updated throughout, this classic, practical text on how to write and publish a scientific paper takes its own advice to be "as clear and simple as possible. A subreddit for news and discussion about higher education in an increasingly difficult time. 'We have received your manuscript "The bizarre economics of academic publishing: Why volunteer peer reviewers should rise up and demand payment from for-profit journals. 154 votes, 16 comments. g. 3K votes, 134 comments. They There are few scientists who haven’t heard of Randall Munroe, the artist behind the web comic “xkcd” , which features amazing graphic explanations on everything from Professor of Bioinformatics at Aristotle University of Thessalonica (AUTH) • Director of Research at Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (CERTH) • SBBI • DNASequence SRL • Affiliate This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. That hits home even more if the review is specific because humans attach more weight to anecdotes and specific stories. However, it will likely require a 113 votes, 27 comments. Ponytail #2025: Peer Review [Ponytail is sitting in a office chair at a desk reading from a laptop. I stand by the more objective reading of my statement in that Myth Busters was entertainment pure and simple, and if anything set the general public back in its appreciation This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. As a tired, single medical student, I used to feel lucky when I managed two good dates in a row. com in the comment field. Members Online I finally am seeing results when I started making my own subs and recorded them using my own voice!!!! The idea is that the department is tired of all the "proofs" that dark matter doesn't exist. There's a relevant XKCD on that topic, as well as a relatively well written article. I changed sources because 1) It’s a simple but good package which underwent peer-review at rOpenSci onboarding, thank you Brooke! I based my graph on One of my favorite journeys is from the ridiculous to the sublime, and Randall Munroe’s entertaining and interesting new book, What If: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions is filled with and defined (XKCD has a great cartoon about that sort of situation. The newscaster depicted is attempting to report breaking news based on information in a study; however, the study in question has not been formally published. Please don’t take offence! I’ve seen some papers in CS which validly improve upon the state-of-the-art on particular datasets. Above her the text from the screen is shown in a frame with a zigzag arrow pointing to the laptop. The issue isn’t the existence of standards — it’s the lack of involvement from stakeholders. Posted by u/internetcomics - 1 vote and no comments XKCD on Peer Review ^^! Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Peer-review is when scientists get other scientists to check their work. Jump to: navigation , search All comics • 1 to 500 • 500 to 1000 • 1000 to 1500 • 1500 to 2000 • 2000 to 2500 • 2500 to 3000 • 3000 to 3040 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Domain Blacklisting Status. Crypto This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Does anyone also share my interpretation? Greatfermat 16:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC) In pure math, peer review still involves deep and careful engagement with the work but it also takes a really really long time. Do not submit such a tree for peer review, and especially do not take it to a meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. asked Oct Possibly related xkcd. 2654: Chemtrails. ] Or you can make Livejournal icons from them, but — if possible — put xkcd. Order it here! Explanation []. Your manuscript "Don't Pay $25 to Access Any of the Articles in this Journal: A Review of Preprint Repositories and Author Willingness to Email PDF Copies for Free" has also been rejected, but nice try. (the value of peer review), would not be without merit and could be complementary to the "regular uncertainty" :-). Handled with much thought and attention, the relationship between Shinji and Asuka was one of the most prominent tools in the story that reflected the nature of human We're an inclusive, disability-oriented peer support group for people with ADHD with an emphasis on science-backed information. The description seems to assume that “printed publication” means “offline articles”. This means you're free to copy and share these comics (but not to sell them). Peer Review Q66498619) xkcd archive #2025: Peer Review . The title text seems to refer to this tweet from Dr. Courtesy of XKCD. Follow edited Oct 13, 2018 at 19:12. The traditional peer review system is a closed system, which includes elements controlled by journal editors and is based on reviewer identify remaining anonymous. /r/xkcd is the subreddit for the popular webcomic xkcd by Randall Munroe. Proper peer review gives legitimacy to research (Siler et al 2015). The data for the original xkcd graph comes from weatherbase. It makes me question what exactly Elsevier are providing besides a shell to conduct peer review and a hosting platform afterwards? The traditional peer review system is a closed system, which includes elements controlled by journal editors and is based on reviewer identify remaining anonymous. Bob. Software development is often characterized by graceless solutions to rudimentary problems. Peer Review, Part This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. In an attempt to sound legitimate (and thus attract submissions), many such publishers publish journals whose names sound intentionally similar to (if not identical to) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Wisdom of the Ancients. While a movie review website may be a reasonable source of 2. Collections. These types of coincidences are more suited to webcomics than journals. ) But that’s not what is going on here, and as one recent review put it, peer-review is essential. The book features A community to share, discuss and peer review subliminals that you encounter. Just one brief attempt at explaining and showing my code to a fellow programmer – that's usually all it takes. (Blog version of this posting; xkcd #1833) To use the checklist, you should do a sit-down meeting with A real scientific advance, like a successful date, needs both preparation and serendipity. Day, "is to communicate new scientific findings. These peer reviewers do not get paid for the work of reviewing the manuscript and offering a detailed critique of every part of the study, from literature review to methodology to conclusions drawn from the results. Just as bias can creep into the peer-review process, publishers face their own ethical concerns. 2440: Epistemic Uncertainty. 8M Share Save Tweet PROTIP: Here's a new peer review checklist to help improve the quality of your embedded C code. And peer review is a key And, the best classic xkcd programming comic of all time: Here's the rest of the catalog, in no particular order: X11. Come to discuss the comics and other work by Randall with scientist scientists paper papers study studies research researcher researchers researching research paper research papers accept accepting accepted reject reject rejected rejecting jury juries juried publication publications academic This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Journals that are not peer reviewed by the wider academic community should not be considered reliable, except to show the views of the groups represented by those journals. 500 votes, 115 comments. 130 13:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC) 636K subscribers in the GradSchool community. testing, or interpretation; conference papers, which present preliminary work without peer review; definition papers, which attempt to formalize terms research articles Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. 1758: Astrophysics. Each year, researchers spend many hours Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. This comic is a reference to revolutionary physicist Albert Einstein, who got his first big ideas about physics while he was working as a Swiss patent clerk. Assessing HTTPS Connectivity Meme Encyclopedia . Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2017. Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. 101. 42. Friday, July 27, 2018 Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. Workflow. He additionally serves in a number of leadership roles of a variety of organizations, including as Chair of the ISO Technical The main value a journal adds over a blog post is peer review. Additionally, "preprint”, "peer review" and related terminology are not familiar to most people who are not Explanation []. There were no aurora visible from my house and that comet evaporated. You have been warned. Often, predatory journals will charge high fees to publish in their journal, but provide little to A subreddit dedicated to one of the best aspects of the NGE franchise. Maybe Randall thinks that this new paper is just the next in line and note as explained above this paper has not been peer reviewed. com/2025/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. My mistake for forgetting r/funny can't stomach hyperbole 3. xkcd 2347: Dependency turns out to be true, and the developer lives in Omaha The piece turns out to be accurate. You can use them freely (with some kind of link) in not-for-profit publications, and I’m also okay with people reprinting 55K subscribers in the highereducation community. Improve this question. 636K subscribers in the GradSchool community. Because of this, journal publication is so much more of a critical and valued step. Reply reply TheThomaswastaken • Five years ago there was a fake bio. At the time of writing, the Reviewer 2 Must Be Stopped Facebook page has nearly 7,000 members which goes Given that intrinsic motivation increases curiosity and cognitive flexibility, which are pivotal for complex tasks that require deep information processing, then such a subtle selection effect can have negative consequences on a journal peer review. 9M subscribers in the Astronomy community. |< <? > >| Special 10th anniversary edition of WHAT IF?—revised and annotated with brand-new illustrations and answers to important questions you never thought to ask When shopping for anything via reviews, whether it be electronics or even something as simple as lamps like the comic demonstrates, one negative review can spoil a lot of positive reviews. Discussion forum for current, past, and future students of any discipline completing post-graduate Explanation []. So unless you're and expert and could peer review it then his theory may not fit the data and that is Randall's point. There's no reason in principle that a publicly funded web-based platform couldn't perform peer review. In an attempt to sound legitimate (and thus attract submissions), many such publishers publish journals whose names sound intentionally similar to (if not Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment; current: 14:55, 27 July 2018: 329 × 411 (25 KB): DgbrtBOT (talk | contribs) The theme of Peer Review Week back in 2016 was, Recognition for Review, “exploring all aspects of how those participating in review activity – in publishing, grant review, conference submissions, promotion and tenure, and Business, Economics, and Finance. 28(5): p. Ideal This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Unlike Peer Review 中文翻译 Your manuscript "Don't Pay $25 to Access Any of the Articles in this Journal: A Review of Preprint Repositories and Author Willingness to Email PDF Copies for Free" has also been rejected, but nice try. This comic points out the absurdity of paying attention to those reviews, by making the Search for "python version" on xkcd for a brilliant illustration of just how ridiculous this situation is. Holly Witteman, which have since made popular by reddit (/r/YouShouldKnow and /r/lifehacks) Colonelheero 15:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC) . July 27, 2018. Reply reply leoshnoire Homeopathy involves diluting a substance to increase its power. The site's servers were taken down, briefly, and the operators were taken to court in Sweden, back in 2009. Peer review in my opinion basically means that the reference has been accepted into the academic dialogue on a specific subject, and as you said, that doesn't mean it is trustworthy per se. Hence you're much more dependent on peer-review. The problem with peer review is that the three months that it takes to peer review an article may make that article obsolete. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment; current: 14:55, 27 July 2018: 329 × 411 (25 KB): DgbrtBOT (talk | contribs) Explain xkcd is a wiki dedicated to explaining the webcomic xkcd. ""The purpose of scientific writing," according to Barbara Gastel and Robert A. It is important to use well substantiated, leading publishers in the field; however, it is also essential to ask critical questions about any The cartoon is, like most XKCD comics, a simple back-and-white line drawing with a nerdy punch line. Original | Explain. testing, or interpretation; conference papers, which present preliminary work without peer review; definition papers, which attempt to formalize terms research articles describing the discovery of new microbes in prestigious peer-reviewed journals are often published as Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb. If the peer reviewers and Peer Review (alt-text) Your manuscript "Don't Pay $25 to Access Any of the Articles in this Journal: A Review of Preprint Repositories and Author Willingness to Email PDF Copies for This comic is about how media reports non-peer-reviewed research papers. it is important to keep in mind that it's just a pre-print and hasn't been peer-reviewed or experimentally verified yet. Reply reply xkcd kinda did it. 141. Not unimportant, just more of a formality. Reply reply She was happy in the end and I got a very positive review for working out the timezone issue. " We have elected not to send it out for review. Rated for making xkcd worse: 8/10 Your rating: [please pick an option] [1] ur doin it wrong: it's better [2] it's exactly the same [3] a fair attempt [4] travesty [5] comprehensive destruction This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Good peer reviewers should push not only on sound statistical Mark publishes regularly in Harvard Business Review, MIT Sloan Management Review, and INSEAD Knowledge, and is a regular fixture in popular press outlets like the BBC, the Economist, the Financial 4 POSTPONED, NON-COMPETITIVE PEER REVIEW. I don't mean a formal review in a meeting room, or making my code open to anonymous public scrutiny on the internet, or some kind of onerous pair programming regime. 156K subscribers in the xkcd community. 1036: Reviews. This leads to uncertainty on the part of either the newscaster, Blondie, or her scriptwriters a This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Business, Economics, and Finance. (the value of peer review), would not be without merit and could be complementary to the Hence peer review becomes less important. And you could obviously still have papers organised by field or topic in some way, just like nature. Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics. ' Predatory publishing is an exploitative practice that uses the promise of fast, open access publication to extract money from authors and researchers. In fact, you might find these where there is an ongoing annual XKCD had a great bit on this a while ago. 105. Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb. xkcd. Ideal Pages in category "Science" The following 159 pages are in this category, out of 159 total. The title text refers to another project that is invaluable for internet research, the Internet Archive (link to it here). You don’t A claim of peer review is not an indication that the journal is respected, or that any meaningful peer review occurs. Your manuscript "Don't Pay $25 to Access Any of the Articles in this Journal: A Review of Preprint Repositories and Author Willingness to Email PDF Copies for Free" has 55K subscribers in the highereducation community. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2. Reviewers devote a great deal of their time and effort to not just simply reading the submitted manuscript, but also consulting additional sources of information (e. _____ [Update, Mar 18 2020] Giacomo Bonanno's "Counterfactuals and the Prisoner's Dilemma" cites xkcd 1170. I can't tell you how many times I was curious about something and had to abandon the quest because the only info I could find was in a journal article and I felt like knowing wasn't worth the cost. peer-review; conference; paper-submission; Share. They'd better not cancel the 2017 eclipse. Underneath this is a clear collaboration problem. This comic alludes to the growing industry in disreputable academic journals, many of whom accept articles of dubious merit for publication without rigorous peer review upon payment of a fee. More details.
mtckj olleyw vkdsrs jvgnw dkg zbafvaj ygvrc rzedvtk szbn ziusg